Democratic Faith
  • HOME
    • Newsmakers Archives >
      • NEWS Jul-Dec2018
  • BOOKS
    • Michael Gecan
  • Craft
    • Victories
    • Leaders
    • Organizers
    • Cutting Edge
    • Gold Standard
  • Faith
    • Under Siege
    • Money
  • Alinsky
  • Blog
    • Notes on Organizing
    • DF Journal
    • Just Art
  • Contact

BLOG

Sink Hole Politics

11/6/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Here's my take on Tuesday.

The Democrats vaunted ground game was paper-thin-- having been absorbed by data mining, niche marketing, consultancies, big money and technologists.  The historic institutional base of the ground game, where real people live and work, has been swallowed up in the process. Neophytes hired to go door to door with smart phones and talk about things they don’t understand is an ersatz ground game.  A blizzard of emails and mobile spots with catchy tags is no substitute.  

By way of contrast, volunteers with community roots, the heart and soul of a real ground game, were few and far between. The exceptions prove the rule.

While running from President Obama the Democrats also ran from the positive real impacts of the Affordable Care Act on families including insuring millions of uninsured and insuring those with preexisting conditions. The data miners, technologists and power political strategists, insulated from interest in real world outcomes like these, had grander, more lucrative poll driven insights to apply.  Those of us following campaigns nationally and locally never heard a word of ACA positives.  Allison Grimes evasion of her own vote for Obama was only the tip of the iceberg.

The Tea Party is a far stronger “grassroots” operation than anything the Democrats have going for them right now.  Freedom Works and the Koch Brothers not withstanding, Tea Party chapters have a social/political life of their own (including in Oracle, AZ) that faux grassroots “progressive” leaning organizations do not.  The internet is not a substitute for face to face engagement and never will be.

From this electoral cycle nobody learned anything.  Neither party tried to teach anyone anything. 

No surprise here but such behavior is deeply disrespectful of citizen voters.  We already knew that Americans were unhappy with Washington.  We already knew that power and money players do their own business there regularly servicing their interests while ignoring the work of the people. 

The most important clues to future vitality of democratic process lie in campaigns that real people actually care about like sentencing reform, minimum wage hikes, health care, housing, school bonds and overrides (passed in Oracle, AZ), training for real high wage jobs, and proper care and attention for veterans.  There’s nothing partisan about this kind of organizing. It’s not grandiose.  It’s slow.  It requires patience.  It demands learning public skills.  It requires support from community based institutions like congregations, schools, and non profits.   It offers great hope in an otherwise bleak public landscape.  The alternative is more of what we experienced this past Tuesday, an electoral sink hole.


Share
1 Comment
Mike Miller
11/8/2014 08:13:34 am

Frank Pierson’s account of the election poses these, among other, questions:

--Why, after 40+ years of institution-based organizing, and many significant accomplishments, hasn’t Alinsky-tradition organizing been able to define a different kind of politics?

--In those places where IAF has built what Pierson calls, “strategic advantage,” why hasn’t that advantage been leveraged into a non-partisan “new politics”—our version of what the Tea Party has done in some Republican primaries? (For reasons Pierson regularly analyzes, we shouldn’t expect the mainline political parties to “teach anyone anything,” yet he seems to wish they would do that.)

In my neck-of-the-woods, the San Francisco Bay Area, one group did accomplish something different in the election. Richmond’s Progressive Alliance (RPA) defeated a Chevron-backed slate that outspent RPA’s four candidates by a 20:1 ratio. And it campaigned on serious issues of real concern in the lives of everyday people.

Perhaps community organizing needs to look at this example and learn something from it.

Mike Miller

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Frank C. Pierson, Jr.

    Frank Pierson retired after forty years of work with the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) as a professional organizer. He began his career in 1971 in Chicago, moved to Queens, New York City and migrated west to work in Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada and Colorado.  He resides with his wife, Mary Ellen Kazda, in Oracle, Arizona.  He may be reached at [email protected]

    Archives

    June 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    January 2016
    August 2015
    May 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013

    RSS Feed

HOME   |    BOOKS   |  CRAFT   |   FAITH   |   ALINSKY  |  BLOG   |   CONTACT

Alinsky Now
  © Democratic Faith | All rights reserved, 2022
  • HOME
    • Newsmakers Archives >
      • NEWS Jul-Dec2018
  • BOOKS
    • Michael Gecan
  • Craft
    • Victories
    • Leaders
    • Organizers
    • Cutting Edge
    • Gold Standard
  • Faith
    • Under Siege
    • Money
  • Alinsky
  • Blog
    • Notes on Organizing
    • DF Journal
    • Just Art
  • Contact