Vile. Vicious. Cruel. Un-American. Un-Christian. In-humane. Words outpouring in the media since April 17 of this year to describe the deliberate separation of children from parents on the US/Mexico border. On that date a zero tolerance policy requiring the prosecution of unauthorized border crossers was implemented by the Department of Homeland Security of the United States of America.
President Trump himself says his own administration’s policy is one he “hates”. Attorney General Jeff Sessions quotes the Bible (ripping a verse out of context) in its defense (Romans 13). Scholars note that the same text Sessions butchers was employed by slave owners to justify their legal right to separate children from their parents along with shackling, beating, caging, torturing and lynching insubordinates, runaways and the randomly unlucky.
President Trump defends the separation of children from their parents as a bargaining chip to persuade Democrats to commit funds to his long sought wall.
Nationwide 2,000 minors were taken from their parents from April 19 through May 31, according to figures from the Department of Homeland Security. The Border Patrol chief for the Rio Grande Valley predicts that number will double as the zero tolerance policy ramps up.
In slave times, the vast majority of “Evangelical Christian” clergy preached support for slave owners from thousands of pulpits, Sunday after Sunday and at mid week services Wednesday evenings. They endorsed the spilling of Southern blood to save the slavocracy in the name of the Prince of Peace, their Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. This deformed (demonic?) version of Christianity didn’t die with them or the defeat of their cause. It lives on in the Scripture contorting Jeff Sessions, his many supporters and the legions of the complicit in the United States of America.
The outrage directed at President Obama for his flip flop on executive actions targeting immigrant detention/deportations has already run its course. Even the reform warrior Congressman Luis Gutierrez moved into reset space in a matter of 24 hours. So much for accounting for promises made and promises broken.
And so it goes in American politics. A few hands wringing, a patter of excoriation, a handful of ominous “we won’t forgets”, a plea to get out the vote and it’s on to the next new, new promise. Real world consequences be damned.
President Obama’s move to defer (or deep six) executive actions, surprised absolutely no one. After all, he plays in the Big Leagues of Power where switcheroos happen all the time. In the Big Leagues word claims come cheap, actions dear.
Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) leaders, funded mostly by “progressive” foundations, remain party men and women when push comes to shove and their party is overwhelmingly Democrat. Outsiders they are not. Being enmeshed in the intricacies and machinations of party politics requires lots of pivots and divots. No one, not one of them, has taken a good hard shot at the man at the top when the opportunity presented with his political chin exposed.
There’s more to this than the absence of an alternative which the Republicans at this time are not. CIR leaders are either domesticated or exiled. Outside voices are faced with the cold realities of this option. Time and again, as I noted in a spring blog, who gets in to the White House for the latest confab determines media recognition and, indirectly, funding prospects for the next round of advocacy.
CIR spokespersons and their funders have long viewed their core position as “inevitable”, the ultimate fixed fight. Demographics as destiny. The burgeoning Latino population sooner or later, they believe, will politically outgun their opponents. This affirmation is intended to comfort and bolster the disappointed, the bitter and the angry. But it’s also misleading and perhaps downright wrong. The inevitable future may be a very long time in the waiting and some very hard work in the making. Political change and inevitability are oxymoronic.
CIR leaders and funders - taken together - have been remarkably unsuccessful in building strong local organizing drives that are deep, institutional and multi dimensional. Grounded local work is either co-opted or dismissed. More than anything else this accounts for the sporadic protests, hand wringing and plucky threats that characterize their actions. Perhaps the best way to put it is that CIR leadership has been Sharptonized, substituting snappy quotes, website and database management, and a bit of street theater for serious organizing work.
Even in the best short term case - where President Obama comes through with serious executive actions that regularize the status of millions, not tens of thousands, of undocumented children and families - the thin organizational fabric on the ground is not positioned to capitalize on this eventuality or, for that matter, defend it. So much for inevitability.
In real time we are experiencing the limits of an ersatz movement that hasn’t yet sunk sufficiently deep roots to turn the political tide. There is nothing inevitable about how and when this may happen.
Frank C. Pierson, Jr.
Frank Pierson retired after forty years of work with the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) as a professional organizer. He began his career in 1971 in Chicago, moved to Queens, New York City and migrated west to work in Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada and Colorado. He resides with his wife, Mary Ellen Kazda, in Oracle, Arizona. He may be reached at email@example.com